<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vote to Bring Back Atlassian&#8217;s Stimulus Package</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aiama.com/2009/07/01/vote-to-bring-back-atlassians-stimulus-package/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aiama.com/2009/07/01/vote-to-bring-back-atlassians-stimulus-package/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:50:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerirgaudi</title>
		<link>http://blog.aiama.com/2009/07/01/vote-to-bring-back-atlassians-stimulus-package/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gerirgaudi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aiama.com/2009/07/01/vote-to-bring-back-atlassians-stimulus-package/#comment-67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ludovic,

Good to hear from you! 

I actually like XWiki quite a bit and have been playing with it here and there (time being one of those rather difficult to come by resources). It really comes down to &lt;em&gt;how fast I can get the wiki up and running&lt;/em&gt;, and the major dependency has nothing to do with the quality of XWiki or Confluence (I do think they&#039;re both top of the line products) but my familiarity with them. I have been a Confluence (and JIRA) user and admin for quite some time now, which allows me to have Confluence up and running in short order. Then there is the question of &lt;em&gt;support&lt;/em&gt; (as in &lt;strong&gt;my&lt;/strong&gt; ability to answer questions or troubleshoot issues, not support from XWiki or Atlassian).

As it turns out, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://skife.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;gracious soul&lt;/a&gt; donated a Confluence license, so I&#039;ll get those $5 to work this weekend, but I will continue to explore XWiki as time permits, because the scripting capabilities you mention are certainly quite useful and a huge plus in XWiki&#039;s favor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ludovic,</p>
<p>Good to hear from you! </p>
<p>I actually like XWiki quite a bit and have been playing with it here and there (time being one of those rather difficult to come by resources). It really comes down to <em>how fast I can get the wiki up and running</em>, and the major dependency has nothing to do with the quality of XWiki or Confluence (I do think they&#8217;re both top of the line products) but my familiarity with them. I have been a Confluence (and JIRA) user and admin for quite some time now, which allows me to have Confluence up and running in short order. Then there is the question of <em>support</em> (as in <strong>my</strong> ability to answer questions or troubleshoot issues, not support from XWiki or Atlassian).</p>
<p>As it turns out, a <a href="http://skife.org/" rel="nofollow">gracious soul</a> donated a Confluence license, so I&#8217;ll get those $5 to work this weekend, but I will continue to explore XWiki as time permits, because the scripting capabilities you mention are certainly quite useful and a huge plus in XWiki&#8217;s favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ludovic Dubost</title>
		<link>http://blog.aiama.com/2009/07/01/vote-to-bring-back-atlassians-stimulus-package/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ludovic Dubost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aiama.com/2009/07/01/vote-to-bring-back-atlassians-stimulus-package/#comment-66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should stick with XWiki, not because Confluence is bad, but because it will get more and more expensive (that&#039;s what happens to proprietary software eventually) and also because XWiki will get better and better.

And you might be amazed by what XWiki can offer with it&#039;s scripting and structured content capabilities. See http://www.dzone.com/links/jazoon_day_2_xwiki.html

Disclaimer: I&#039;m the XWiki founder]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should stick with XWiki, not because Confluence is bad, but because it will get more and more expensive (that&#8217;s what happens to proprietary software eventually) and also because XWiki will get better and better.</p>
<p>And you might be amazed by what XWiki can offer with it&#8217;s scripting and structured content capabilities. See <a href="http://www.dzone.com/links/jazoon_day_2_xwiki.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dzone.com/links/jazoon_day_2_xwiki.html</a></p>
<p>Disclaimer: I&#8217;m the XWiki founder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

